Walking outside huge fashion streets and stores in the country and worldwide, it is interesting to see brands that are so intensely associated with overconsumption, starting to introduce sustainability initiatives. Many of them even explicitly ask you to not buy clothes unnecessarily. Millions of discarded clothes end up as waste, piling up in landfills and creating mountains of textile cast-offs. The majority of these items could have been re-worn, reused, or recycled, yet they continue to end up as waste.
This growing issue is putting major retailers under increasing pressure to take meaningful action and implement more responsible waste management practices.
While companies like Adidas and luxury giant Kering — the parent company of brands such as Alexander McQueen and Gucci — have set ambitious targets for collecting used garments, the broader goal is clear: to ramp up textile recycling, keep clothes out of landfills, and give fashion waste a second life.
H&M’s Conscious Collection and Zara’s Join Life line exemplify efforts to incorporate recycled materials and promote circular fashion. Yet, industry observers have made claims that despite these initiatives, both brands continue to face scrutiny over their broader environmental impact and accusations of ‘greenwashing’, raising questions about the authenticity and depth of their sustainability claims.
With glossy catwalks, glitzy trends, and overnight sensations, it’s true that fashion is a world built on constant reinvention. Yet behind the allure of the latest drop lies a deeply frayed system. The global fashion industry, worth a staggering $1.84 trillion and contributing 1.63% to the world’s GDP, is confronting a long-overdue reckoning. As the climate crisis intensifies and consumers demand accountability, fashion must grapple with an uncomfortable truth: its allure comes at an immense environmental and human cost.
The industry alone contributes 8–10% of global carbon emissions—more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined. Each year, it generates 92 million tons of textile waste, with much of it either incinerated or dumped in landfills. A single cotton shirt guzzles over 2,700 litres of water during its production, while the industry as a whole consumes a jaw-dropping 79 trillion litres annually. Then there’s the plastic: synthetic fabrics release over 500,000 tons of microplastics into waterways each year. Compounding this crisis is the grim social reality—an estimated 50 million people are trapped in modern slavery, many within the opaque corners of the fashion supply chain.
But fashion’s unravelling isn’t just a crisis. It is an opportunity. Driven by regulation, consumer demand, and innovation, a systemic transformation is taking root—one that promises to redefine fashion from fibre to finish.
Spotlight on India’s Fashion Industry
In India, one of the world’s largest garment producers and exporters, the fashion supply chain is marked by both promise and peril. The 2024 Fashion Transparency Index flagged major transparency gaps globally—but Indian brands were especially concerning. According to the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), nearly 79% of environmental claims made by Indian brands were either misleading or completely unsubstantiated.
This trust gap is wide: only 29% of Indian consumers say they trust sustainability claims made by fashion brands. That skepticism is well-founded. Investigations by non-profit Transparentem in Madhya Pradesh revealed forced and child labour across 90 cotton farms, with workers exposed to toxic chemicals and bound by exploitative contracts. Despite these abuses, raw material suppliers—especially those in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities—are rarely disclosed in brand reports, keeping violations hidden from public scrutiny.
This opacity also fuels greenwashing. Just as European regulators struggle to verify the authenticity of “recycled yarns” or eco-labels, India’s regulatory frameworks remain nascent. Brands can still advertise sustainability while dodging genuine accountability.
The World Watches
Globally, governments are raising the bar. The EU is at the forefront, rolling out sweeping reforms like the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). These policies enforce strict standards on durability, recyclability, and human rights due diligence. Meanwhile, the Digital Product Passport (DPP) will soon require every product to come with a scannable QR code that reveals its environmental impact and supply chain footprint.
The U.S. is not far behind. New York and California have banned PFAS “forever chemicals” in clothing starting 2025, while Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws in states like Oregon and California are shifting waste disposal costs back to the brands. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) is also being enforced with greater rigor, underscoring the rising scrutiny on unethical labour practices.
Fashion’s Digital Thread
As policy tightens, technology is stepping in to bridge the compliance gap. Blockchain is revolutionizing traceability by creating tamper-proof records of a product’s journey. Brands like Givenchy and Breitling are already using it to authenticate products and verify ethical sourcing. Artificial Intelligence is being deployed to refine demand forecasting, helping brands slash the overproduction that fuels fashion waste. Over 70% of mass-market design now uses 3D sampling—reducing the need for physical prototypes and cutting time-to-market drastically.
On the recycling front, companies like Circ and Syre (partnering with H&M in a $100 million initiative) are pioneering closed-loop systems to recover and reuse cotton and polyester from discarded clothes. Yet the biggest challenge remains scale. While these breakthroughs are promising, they’re still far from replacing the global supply chain’s vast output.
The Conscious Consumer Is Here to Stay
Fashion’s new power players aren’t designers or CEOs—they’re conscious consumers, especially Gen Z. A remarkable 73% of Gen Z buyers say they’re willing to pay more for sustainable products. Globally, three out of five shoppers now consider sustainability when making purchasing decisions.
This shift is transforming fashion’s economics. The resale market is booming, growing at 12% annually and poised to represent 10% of global apparel sales by end-2025. Even the popularity of ‘dupes’, the affordable alternatives to luxury products, reflects a rising awareness that value isn’t just about price tags, but also about ethics, craftsmanship, and longevity.
Indian consumers are also leaning into this shift. There’s growing support for small, artisan-driven labels that emphasize fair wages, traditional techniques, and lower environmental footprints. The demand for transparency is turning the spotlight on brands that embrace purpose over profit.
Strategies for a Sustainable Tomorrow
Rebuilding the fashion industry from the ground up demands sweeping reforms. At the heart of this lies radical transparency. Disclosing only Tier 1 suppliers is no longer enough; brands must trace their materials to the farm or mine. Technologies like blockchain and initiatives like the Higg Facility Environmental Module (FEM) are helping brands gather real-time environmental and social data. Movements like Fashion Revolution are amplifying the push for visibility, calling for a new era of open accountability.
Decarbonisation is another key pillar. Since 70% of emissions occur in the early supply chain, investments in renewable energy, regenerative agriculture, and innovations like waterless dyeing are crucial. Brands such as Primark are taking first steps by designing garments to withstand 45+ washes—reducing their water, carbon, and waste footprints by nearly 30%.
A material revolution is also underway. With over 70% of textiles still made from fossil-fuel-derived synthetics, shifting to organic cotton, recycled fibres, and bio-based materials is imperative. Innovations like Mirum (plant-based leather) and Biosteel (biodegradable fibre used by Adidas) hint at a plastic-free future—but scaling them will require major R&D investments.
Circularity, once a buzzword, is fast becoming a business imperative. From design-for-disassembly to large-scale recycling infrastructure and take-back programs, the industry is learning to close the loop. France and Belgium’s EPR laws already compel brands to take responsibility for a garment’s entire lifecycle. Meanwhile, fast fashion giant Inditex is working with Ambercycle to scale up recycled polyester production.
None of this will work without ethical labour practices. Ensuring safe conditions and living wages—especially among invisible Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers—is not optional. Brands must go beyond audits, setting wage benchmarks and forging binding agreements. While “nearshoring” and “friendshoring” (producing closer to home or in politically friendly regions) are gaining ground, they introduce new challenges in capacity and cost.
🌏 Fashion Sustainability & Greenwashing: India vs Europe (2024 Snapshot)
Category | India | Europe |
Sustainability Claims Accuracy | 79% of green claims are exaggerated or misleading (ASCI) | 59% of claims found to be vague or unverifiable (EU Commission) |
Consumer Trust | Only 29% of consumers trust sustainability claims (ASCI) | Around 44% consumer trust in major European countries (EU Survey 2023) |
Raw Material Supplier Disclosure | Very limited, <5% brands disclose Tier 2/3 suppliers (Transparentem) | Only 5% disclose raw material suppliers (Fashion Transparency Index) |
Labour & Environmental Violations | 90 cotton farms in Madhya Pradesh found using forced & child labor | Labour exploitation mostly in outsourced supply chains (e.g., Bangladesh) |
Government Regulation | ASCI Guidelines against greenwashing launched mid-2023 | EU Green Claims Directive introduced to standardize & verify claims |
Focus of Activism & Scrutiny | Waste management, labour rights, textile waste | Fast fashion emissions, synthetic fibers, microplastics |
The Road Ahead
The path to sustainability is expensive, complex, and slow. Experts estimate that the global industry needs more than $1 trillion in investment to hit its sustainability targets. Smaller brands, which make up over 90% of the sector, often lack access to capital, technology, or certified suppliers. Fragmented global supply chains and the lack of standardised data make it hard to benchmark progress.
Still, the pressure to change is mounting. Regulatory frameworks like the EU’s Digital Product Passport and India’s evolving EPR policy are setting new norms. The climate clock is ticking, and brands that delay may find themselves left behind—not just in compliance, but in relevance.
The fashion industry, long defined by speed and spectacle, is learning to slow down and stitch purpose into its seams. A new era is unfolding—one that redefines success not by runway applause, but by impact, responsibility, and resilience.
In present times, when there is heightened awareness of climate change and the importance of environmental sustainability, Carbon Neutral Babies provides an exciting launching point for discussions about ecological responsibility from the earliest days of our lives.
The term speaks to the notion of raising children in a manner that offsets the carbon cost associated with their growth trajectory and lifestyle choices. Raising carbon-neutral babies encourages parenting styles that are less harmful to the environment, given the extent individual consumption habits affect environmental damage. These include the intentional planning we do around logistics, what food we consume, and which products we choose to buy—all of which are crucial elements of building a sustainable future. Individualism is a popular concept in society, with a growing movement towards environmental care that would not be at the cost of other policies. Hence, there arises the need for values-based education, which is based on an incremental understanding that students must be educated into values that prompt the next generation to act towards the planet in the stewardship movement.
Carbon neutrality, also referred to as net-zero carbon emissions, means that an individual, company, or group has found a balance between the carbon dioxide used and the emissions released. We need to raise babies in an enabling environment for healthy growth and development—and that will only be achieved once we reach carbon neutrality, because babies are particularly vulnerable to the ravages of climate change, which can exacerbate some health conditions and delay their development. Efforts towards carbon neutrality, particularly through frugal innovations in healthcare and other sectors, can counter these risks enormously. Long-term strategies need to be based on sustainability and the use of environmentally-friendly resources that can consolidate improved health status not only in the present but also in agreement with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, thus answering the request for a healthier world for future generations. Including carbon neutrality in public health policies can not only protect the health of newborns but also support broader environmental sustainability initiatives.
The things they do will have an environmental cost, and childcare decisions are just the tip of a much larger iceberg that will shape global sustainability and future generations. How has the emergence of parents with a growing awareness of the ecological costs of procreating and raising children grappled with the ethical dilemma of resource consumption needed to nurture human capabilities for future generations of development? Listening to the public goods pitch: desirable future people, of which the world needs more, motivates better environmental stewards. However, this notion is contested in light of alternative opportunities—for example, replacement migration—that may prove more efficient in the production of human capital, thus raising doubts about the moral legitimacy of the taxpayers’ obligations to children after all. In this way, sustainable parenting styles, such as choosing green products and parenting, are essential. Understanding what child-rearing entails and how it relates to environmental sustainability will be vital for designing conscientious, net-zero tomorrows.
As society slowly wakes up to the environmental impact of practically everything we do, from food to furniture to fashion, the carbon footprint that can come with a child, as well as the products and care that need to service them, can no longer be overlooked. Many ubiquitous baby products—from disposable diapers to plastic toys—contribute a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions over their life cycle, from manufacturing through transportation and disposal. Disposable diapers, for example, create millions of tons of waste and waste a great deal of energy. The care products used on babies, such as lotions and wipes, are also often sold in single-use plastic packaging, further increasing their environmental footprint. Introducing sustainable approaches—such as sustainable, eco-friendly, and mindful products—may help reduce a mother’s stress levels while pregnant, since a mother’s stress levels during pregnancy can directly impact her child’s health outcomes. Therefore, making baby care carbon neutral will not just conserve the planet but also work wonders for the well-being of mothers and children.
There are a lot of changes we need to make to give birth to carbon-neutral babies. One excellent idea is to go green with eco-friendly products such as biodegradable diapers and organic baby food that reduce a household’s carbon footprint. Aside from the positive health implications for both mothers and babies, raising awareness among parents about the significance of breastfeeding could help sustainability endeavours, as formula production entails packing and distribution, which in turn increases the carbon footprint. Ultimately, the most crucial component of developing a deep affinity for nature is spending time with it—walking, playing outside, doing yard work in the children’s garden, etc.—instilling environmental stewardship from the ground up. Therefore, exploring and showcasing public policies favouring sustainable childcare, as revealed in the many cases surveyed in Nordic countries, could offer some hints to reinforce the setting off of eco-friendly practices. These approaches give children the power to make sustainable choices while also helping build a healthier planet, ensuring they’re ready to take those ideals with them as they grow up!
Being sustainable in baby-rearing and parenting is a growing concern in this world, but it is also about finding harmony between family needs and environmental impact, encouraging positive outcomes for families. An example of this is in the green products world: biodegradable diapers, organic baby food, etc., which generate less waste and are better for the baby. Outside the womb, practices such as cloth diapering or breastfeeding can sustainably contribute to a family’s carbon footprint with the ultimate goal of creating carbon-neutral living spaces for future generations. Product decisions must be made carefully, as must those involving the mental wellness of caregivers—studies show parents of children in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) experience higher levels of stress that could hinder their ability to parent. So while eco-friendly methods are crucial for sustainable parenting, we shouldn’t forget that stress management techniques can foster the flourishing of environmentally conscious habits and promote overall family wellness to raise carbon-neutral kids.
The international community’s transition to carbon neutrality has complex and deep impacts on future generations. Children born into a post-Paris Agreement world where sustainability is the order of the day can expect unpolluted air, rich ecosystems, and a stable temperature regime, which will be a world away from the ongoing environmental pillaging happening at the moment. In their quest for cleaner sources of power, newer ideas for carbon sequestration, or more sustainable farming practices, we are not only minimising harm as a result of climate change but also setting the standard for responsible caretakers of the earth for years to come. To bring about such a transition, we need an education system that develops sustainability as its main focus and empowers young people to freely engage in dialogues and activities around climate. “Carbon neutral babies,” as a result, will inherit not just a world determined to reduce emissions but also one featuring a vigorous conversation advocating for a constant commitment to innovation and responsibility. The legacy of the decisions of the current era will define what kind of ecosystem we will operate in, highlighting the urgency and cooperation required for a joint pathway to carbon neutrality.
Copyright © 2025 Green Trendsetters. Terms of use. Privacy policy.